I must apologize, It has taken me to long to respond to all of Mrs Willis' comments. I've been out celebrating our recent victory every night since the election like it was Hanukkah! Now keep in mind this is with 4 Captn-N-Cokes on board and both hands tied behind my back! Here goes....
* “vote themselves a 3% raise…” First and foremost NOTHING enters a firefighter’s contract without being agreed upon by the Board of Commissioners (BOC). As the current contract was created under the now removed Ranney & Anderson, your beef is with them. As a side note, do you have any comment for the 5% raises that Hennesy had in his contract, when he was the ONLY employee of the district that receiving a raise?
* “average firefighter wages start at $50 - $60k…” A firefighter after achieving 1st class (4-5 years), with longevity and specialty pay might make $50k but I assure you no one is walking in off of the street making that kind of bank.
* “union contract demands…” Again, the contract is agreed upon by the district and the union. As a side note, if a negotiation cannot be reached between the union and the district, do you know who has the final say? It’s the district! They still have full control. The union only gives us an opportunity to ask for something.
* “3% sounds small…” Quick math lesson: 3% of $1,000 is $30, not $300. And by the way, any tax increase last October, which was implemented by your dear Ranney & Anderson, was done before the contract was ratified.
* “The worst part is…” I’ll give you this one. Our district has lowered taxes in the past (were you here for the Palm-Aire Commissioners?) with disastrous results, forcing the Inter local agreement with CHFD. Perhaps there are areas of the budget that could be reduced which would enable lowering our taxes. Are there any expenses in our department hat could be lowered? Did we need a $30,000 phone system, $70,000 lightning protection? What about the allegations (you know they’re true) of misappropriation of funds against some of the current and former administration?
* “Ruben has promises…” I assure you the department has NO SHORTAGE of legal advice. I sincerely doubt that the BOC would remove the Fire Chief on a whim. If the allegations of wrongdoing are true, I would hope/expect that the BOC would hold the Fire Chief to the same ethical and legal standards that is expected of us, the firefighters.
* “Ruben will then make…” The BOC hires the Fire Chief. Yes, they have the authority to hire/promote whomever they chose but those decisions are, in reality, made below the BOC. By the way, you continue to state that all of these promotional opportunities exist when the investigation (conducted by an investigator appointed by Ranney and Anderson) has yet to show any wrongdoing. If all of these allegations are false… Oh, never mind.
* “opposition by Assistant Chief Thayer…” How do you dismiss someone on “false accusations” when there is an investigation being conducted? Just as much as you don’t want to hear it, I do want to hear the TRUTH!
* “Bennett may get his job back…” If there is any truth in your blog, this is the one that I want to happen. Jerry was injured on the job and then fired because workers comp refuses to perform the surgery his private doctor said would fix him. It is an expensive surgery and it’s cheaper for workers comp to retrain him for another occupation than to fix him. This department and its citizens have an OBLIGATION to help a firefighter that is injured on duty, not discard him because he is the one who brought the union to SMFR! His termination was a blatant anti-union message that sickens me.
* “Firefighters from Tampa and St. Pete…” I was at the polls. I assure you there was not a single firefighter from Tampa or St. Pete. We had ONE firefighter (I think from West Manatee) assisting family members of one of our employees. You can claim Bob Sweat told you but since I saw former Commissioner Ranney drive by my poll THREE TIMES and former Commissioner Anderson and Assistant Chief Thayer each drive by once, I’m betting that’s your source. The reality is we had several firefighters’ family members standing with them, along with the new Commissioners and their families. While the faces may have been unfamiliar, all but the WMFR firefighter I already mentioned were part of this department.
* “Dropping all these ludicrous…” Again, the investigator that was appointed by the old BOC will determine what’s ludicrous. BTW, if you shoot me your email address, I have an email to forward you; just don’t open it in front of your kids or at church…
* “Not promoting putting Pete Donchenko…” What promotion? All of these allegations are false, right? I fail to see how a BOC could terminate an employee when they have done nothing wrong (well, except for Jerry).
* “Let Deputy Chief Berry…” Are we referring to the same Deputy Chief that your beloved former Commissioner Anderson voted for as the new Fire Chief but lost in 3-2 vote against Chief Gover?
* “let the department run right…” The only evidence of good ol’ boy I’ve seen is your grandstanding for people that have some serious allegations against them, with proof to back up the allegations. I understand that everyone is innocent until proven guilty but c’mon. Your efforts to dismiss these allegations are the type of good ol’ boy thing we are trying to get away from. If it’s not okay for a blue shirt firefighter, it is not okay for 5 bugles either.
* “Hennesy’s name through the mud…” As a taxpayer, you should be appalled at the allegations against him. Perhaps the accusations are false and the investigation will reveal that. Perhaps the photographs that support the allegations are fake and the public records have been doctored, perhaps…
* “dirty campaign overall…” Every bit of our campaign was ethical. We went door to door to speak with the voters and inform them of the issues and what the Commissioners that we support are going to do to fix it. We put out signs, after receiving permission from the property owner, unlike Ranney who literally put a sign on vacant property owned by what is now, a new Commissioner (pretty sure he wouldn’t have agreed to that).
Oh, by the way, we reported every penny we received and spent, as required. How did Anderson and Soloman buy any signs if they never received a penny? And that’s who you want in office?
* “and start fresh!” AMEN, SISTER!!!
Time to go sleep this one off.......